• Users Online: 245
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 429-437

A novel experimental static deflection equation for specific cantilever beam made of ionic polymer–metal composite


1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Mycobacteriology Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Energy Engineering and Economics, Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission27-May-2022
Date of Decision09-Aug-2022
Date of Acceptance29-Aug-2022
Date of Web Publication17-Sep-2022

Correspondence Address:
Jalaledin Ghanavi
Mycobacteriology Research Centre (MRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Poopak Farnia
Mycobacteriology Research Centre (MRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_180_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Nowadays, ionic polymer–metal composites are widely used in various industries. They are in the group of electroactive polymers and smart materials with electromechanical properties. By applying a small amount of voltage, the nonlinear stress inside them will happen and their deformation can be seen. The energy transformation from electrical to mechanical is observable during the process of giving voltage to a specimen. The aim of this study is to investigate a novel experimental static deflection equation for specific cantilever beam made of ionic polymer–metal composite. Methods: In this paper, an ionic-polymer-metal composite is provided; the main core is based on an electroactive Fluoropolymer named Nafion, and the coated electrodes are made of Platinum. The length of the specimen is 27.131 mm and its width is 5.728mm. Voltage from 1.5 to 4.3V was applied to the specimen used in this study; the y-directional displacement of the IPMC at each step is measured and recorded; then, a finite element analysis was performed. Curve fitting of the data for the experimental analysis was also done. Moreover, the governing relations of IPMC according to the Nernst–Planck equation were investigated in this study. Results: The results have been validated in two forms of finite element method and experimental analysis. The results of finite element analysis showed that the ion flux in the polymer is calculated by the equation: [INSIDE:1]. In other words, this equation, which is called Nernst–Planck, is the basic equation of this type of material. This equation is the main governing equation to describe the transfer phenomena of IPMC materials. Furthermore, in order to calculate the deflection of IPMC membrane, 19 equations designed in this study were used. In the next step, the results of the experimental analysis showed that, based on the field emission scanning electron microscope images, the Nafion surface is completely sandblasted and its area is completely uniform. The right image taken by Dino-Lite shows the thesis effect on the electrode. Furthermore, the results showed that IPMC has high-quality coated electrodes. Conclusions: It is shown that a nonlinear equation governs the behavior of IPMCs' deflection versus voltage.

Keywords: Experimental analysis, finite element method, ionic polymer–metal composites, micro-electro-mechanical systems, smart material


How to cite this article:
Nasrollah A, Farnia P, Hamidgorgani S, Ghanavi J. A novel experimental static deflection equation for specific cantilever beam made of ionic polymer–metal composite. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 2022;6:429-37

How to cite this URL:
Nasrollah A, Farnia P, Hamidgorgani S, Ghanavi J. A novel experimental static deflection equation for specific cantilever beam made of ionic polymer–metal composite. Biomed Biotechnol Res J [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 31];6:429-37. Available from: https://www.bmbtrj.org/text.asp?2022/6/3/429/356152




  Introduction Top


The growing trend of these materials has led to the production of a type of smart material that is used in various industries such as electromechanics, defense, and aerospace industries.[1] Mechanical flexibility, lightweight, and smooth processing are a number of the inherent properties of all polymers;[2] further to these properties, a few polymers show off massive property changes in reaction to electric stimulation which provides great benefits to their potential applications.[3] One cause for interest in IPMC is that they are known as electroactive polymers (EAPs), which are taken into consideration to be options for conventional actuators and sensor substances.[3] Although there are various ways to produce energy such as using Stirling engines[4],[5] or simply fossil fuels like oil, using IPMC as an energy harvester can be a huge help to future progresses.[6],[7] EAPs are substances that reply mechanically to electrical stimulation with considerable shape and size alterations.[8] They may be categorized into main classes based on the activation mechanism; for instance, if they are electronic or ionic EAPs.[9] Coulomb forces drive the electronic EAPs, which include electrostrictive, electrostatic, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric.[10],[11] Ionic polymer gels, ionic polymer–metal composites, conductive polymers, and carbon nanotubes are several examples of ionic EAPs. Ionic-based polymers require a totally small activation voltage.[12] The utility of active substances as sensors and actuators in smart systems has currently extended considerably intending to enhance the intelligence, reliability, and overall performance of the systems.[13] The most common polymers consist of perfluorinated alkane containing short side chains terminated with an ionic group such as SO3, and there are three main polymeric ion exchange membranes consisting of Nafion, Flemion, and Aciplex.[14] The membrane is composed of noble metals such as silver, gold, platinum, and palladium in some chemical processes.[15] Nafion is also used as a conductor for proton exchange in fuel cells and water filtration and allows cations to move, coated with gold.[16]

Nowadays, one of these smart materials, which are used as actuators and sensors[17] based on EAPs,[18] has received a lot of attention due to their good capabilities and flexibility;[19] the field of ionic polymers has seen rapid growth in academic[20] attention as well as industrial[21] and medical applications in recent decades.[22] The use of ionic polymers as artificial muscles,[23] actuators,[24] and sensors is one promising area.[25]

The shrinking of mechatronic systems makes robots increasingly important in micro and nano sizes, which will play a major role in future developments.[26] Sensors and actuators are made of EAPs due to their special properties.[27] The characteristics of these materials include their response to low voltages which means <5V,[28] high sensitivities to external stimulus, and high power;[29] however, IPMCs also have negative properties such as short service life and short durability and lifetime, as well as a rapid reduction in efficiency due to ionic and electrolytic properties.[30]

Piezoelectric materials are known as one of the most important smart materials in the world with electromechanical properties and are among the most commonly used materials.[31] IPMCs withstand significant bending deformations at low driving voltages.[32] When IPMCs operate above 1.23V in the air, water-based IPMCs lose a considerable amount of their solvent content.[33] They have been modeled as both capacitive and resistive element actuators that operate like biological muscle and offer an appealing way of actuation for biomechanic and biomimetic applications.[34],[35],[36],[37] In this paper, a novel method is used to investigate the attitude of the ionic polymer–metal composites with both finite element method (FEM) and experimental tests.


  Methods Top


In this study, referring to the electroactivity of the actuator made from IPMC due to the presence of the Nafion polymer, the displacement of the membrane under the application of voltage was investigated in both theoretical and practical ways. The structure of these smart materials is described in “[Figure 1].”
Figure 1: Structure of ionic-polymer-metal composite before and after applying voltage

Click here to view


According to [Figure 1], red and blue circles are free cations and water molecules, respectively. Electromechanical stress and, as a result, a deflection occur through the ionic polymer metal composites by applying a DC voltage; this voltage must be applied to the electrode domain which is specified with yellow color; the voltage will be transferred to the EAPs which in this case is Nafion. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committees of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science (IR.SBMU.NRITLD.REC.1401028).


  Results Top


The results have been validated in two forms of FEM and experimental analysis, and they are discussed in the following.

Finite element analysis

The FEM and the governing equations of the materials with electromechanical properties have been used for numerical analysis of the abovementioned material. The ion flux in the polymer is calculated by Equation 1; in the other words, this equation, which is named Nernst–Planck, is the fundamental equation of this type of material. This equation is the main governing equation for describing IPMC material transfer phenomena. In order to calculate the deflection of the IPMC membrane, equations 1–19 have been used as below:[38]

Eq. 1



In “Equation 1,” C is the cationic concentration, is cation flux, the diffusion coefficient is shown by D, μ is the mobility that can be obtained from Equation 2, the symbol of charge number is Z, F is the Faraday constant, ∇V and is the molar volume; ∇V is the electric potential gradient which is explained by the Poisson equation; ∇ϕ has a reverse direction in the case of mechanical-electrical transitions because the ionic current is not controlled by the applied voltage; it is controlled by a pressure gradient under a bending pressure ∇P, which is the solvent pressure. Equation 2 explains the mobility of cations; in this equation, R is the gas constant and T is the absolute temperature.

Some of the values mentioned are given in [Table 1].[34]
Table 1: Properties of the ionic polymer–metal composite and other parameters

Click here to view


Eq. 2



Eq. 3



In Equation 3, ρ is the charge density and ϵ is the effective dielectric permittivity. ϵ can be written as ϵ = ϵ0ϵr; ϵ0 is the dielectric permittivity in vacuum and is equal to 8.85 × 10 − 12F. m−1. Furthermore, Ca is known as anion concentration. C is the cation concentration calculated by Nernst–Planck equation which was mentioned in Equation 1. Then, the charge density can be calculated from Equation 4.[39]

Eq. 4



Due to Equation 5, the displacement vector is represented by u, in which the anion concentration is related to the local volumetric strain. A positive value of volumetric strain means an increase in volume strain and a negative value means a decrease in volume.

Eq. 5



Volume changes in the matrix of polymer affect the concentration of local anions because the anions are part of the backbone of the polymer. Hence, the concentration of the anion can be calculated from Equation 6; in this respect, C0 is the primary focus of cations or anions. It should be noted that for most practical calculations, Ca = C0 can be approximated.

Eq. 6



According to the momentum conservation, the relation between solvent pressure 'nabla P' and polymer pressure 'nabla p' are explains in Equation 7.

Eq. 7



In Equation 8, E is Young's modulus of the material, and ν is Poisson's ratio.

Eq. 8



Knowing these constants, Navier's equation for displacements can be written as Equation 9; in that, F is the force per unit volume:

Eq. 9



In Equation 10, Newton's second law is used to describe time-dependent deformation. In this equation, rho is the density of the material, while C is the Navier's constant.

Eq. 10



In order to investigate the effect of the electrodes in the model, the ionic current in the polymer is coupled with the electric current in the electrodes. Unlike many physics-based models, electrodes are not considered ideal, but they are limited electrical conductors. In electrodes, the Ohm's law differential for current density is expressed as in Equation 11.

Eq. 11



In Equation 11, σ is the electrical conductivity of the electrodes, and V and j are the electric potential and current density in the electrodes, respectively. It should be noted that the electrical potential ϕ inside the polymer and the electrical potential V at the electrodes are two different variables.

The ionic current at the electrode boundaries is calculated by applying Gauss's law directly. As it is observable in [Figure 2], in order to use finite element method, whole membrane is divided to 2 main domains; electrode domain ψa and polymer domain Ω. ∂Γ as a contour can be considered in a way that covers the entire domain Ω and the boundary between Ω and ψa and a small part of ψb. In the contour ∂Γ, the integral form of Gauss's law can be written as Equation 12.
Figure 2: Structure of IPMC before and after applying voltage

Click here to view


Eq. 12



where n is a normal unit vector in ∂Γ. Given that in Ω, the net charge density is zero and using the Poisson equation in Equation 3, the expression can be simplified as Equation 13.

Eq. 13



There is no charge density inside the electrode, except on its surface. Load density is indicated by ρb. Since the potential gradient in the x direction is very small and the values of the linear integrals on the segments are small, the equation can be simplified with opposite values as Equation 14.



Since the potential gradient in the Y direction at the electrode is expected to be negligible, the second component of Equation 14 on the left is omitted. The integral on the right is equal to the load accumulated in length and is denoted by q' in Equation 15.

Eq. 15



If d is assumed to be the width of the IPMC in the z-direction, the total current is shown in Equation 16.

Eq. 16



To calculate j, which is the current density, a large number of lines Γ1 . . . Γn are considered. While n → ∞, the length of the contour parts is specified by dΓi, Γai, and Γbi for the vertical, top, and bottom parts, respectively. Given that line integrals at the internal boundaries cancel each other out, the left-hand side of the equation contains the following expressions as shown in Equation 17.

Eq. 17



As mentioned earlier, the voltage gradient in the sections Γ and Γn+1 is negligible and there is no potential gradient in the y direction in the lower sections of ∂Γbi; the current contour Γai can be expressed in Equation 18.

Eq. 18



Therefore, the density of the local ion current in the y-direction on the electrode boundary is shown in Equation 19.

Eq. 19



The electrode and polymer properties are illustrated in [Table 2], respectively. Like all computer-aided engineering methods, this analysis follows the FEM. First of all, the two-dimensional model was designed with the characteristics mentioned in [Table 2]. Next step in finite element method is applying material properties; these properties are added from [Table 1] and 2.[34] In the third step, the model has meshed. Totally 48 elements were created.
Table 2: Properties of the polymer and platinum

Click here to view


Then, the boundary conditions which were the whole physics, fixed edges, and applying voltage, exactly like the abovementioned equations, were applied. By using its result, which was the force per volume, in the deflection and stress equations, the von Mises stress and the deflection of the designed model had been calculated.

Creating mesh is vital in finite element method. after doing a mesh convergence, it is understood that 480 elements are the highest number that can lead the simulation to precise results [40],[41] After solving the model using FEM, the deflection of the membrane and its stress were calculated using the Timoshenko beam theory. This analysis was time dependent, and the voltage increased from 0 to 4.3V. [Figure 3] illustrates the deformation of membrane and its stress while applying 3.3V.
Figure 3: Deformation of membrane and its stress while applying 3.3V

Click here to view


Due to [Figure 3], the stress is highlighted by colors; red and blue are the least and highest amounts of stress in N/m2. The displacement can be observed from the axis of the plot.

[Figure 4] shows the graph of deflection which is relative to the voltage from 0 to 4.5V while x = 27.131 mm. It is obvious that from 0 to 3.27V, the graph follows an increasing path; its peak occurred with 3.2V which is 25.1 mm. After it, with rising the amount of applied voltage, the displacement will decrease.
Figure 4: The deflection of the membrane while x = 27.131 mm by changing voltage

Click here to view


Then, by comparing numerical values and curve fitting the experimental data, the governing equation was obtained. According to Nernst–Planck equation, which is mentioned in Equation 1, the nonlinear behavior of the ionic polymer–metal composite is caused by the amount of cation concentration through the prepared EAPs; because of the deflection equation of distributed load on a cantilever beam following Timoshenko beam theory, the curve fitted graph must be a sin-based equation; the fitted curve is observable in Equation 20 that illustrates the deflection attitude of the IPMC membrane while the x-directional location is equal to 27.131 mm.

This graph shows that the maximum displacement appears while the applied voltage is 3.3V.

Eq. 20

y (v)= (183.7sin (0.6024 v + 0.9567) + 178sin (0.624 v + 4.165)

+1.191sin (2.585 v + 1.547) + 0.1674sin (4.039 v + 2.321)

+0.01537sin (7.782 v2.582) + 0.1609sin (5.389 v + 1.814))

From Equation 20, it is obvious that at the beginning of the test, while the applied voltage is infinity, the cation concentration is extremely high.

Experimental analysis

In this step, the deflection of the manufactured actuator from IPMC material is investigated. The specimen was manufactured using Nafion and Platinum with complex chemical processes; then, the membrane was checked using field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and Dino-Lite AM4113ZT which are observable in [Figure 5]a and [Figure 5]b, respectively.
Figure 5: Surface of Nafion (a) and IPMC (b)

Click here to view


In the FESEM image, it is shown that the surface of the Nafion is perfectly sandblasted, and its area is pretty uniform; the right image taken by the Dino-Lite shows the dissertation effect on the electrode; this effect must have happened to the coated metal, and it occurs correctly; it means that the IPMC has high-quality coated electrodes.

[Figure 6] shows the IPMC cross-section. This picture was taken with the purpose of IPMC measurement; with the use of [Figure 6], the thickness of the polymer core of material made of Nafion and electrodes made of platinum were considered; as measures are shown in the picture, the total thickness of our specimen is 134.813 μm and 72.588 μm and 24.189 μm are the thicknesses of the polymer and electrodes, respectively. These dimensions were used for finite element analysis and for experimental tests. An electronic microscope was used to calculate and capture the thickness of the Nafion and platinum layers.
Figure 6: IPMC cross-section

Click here to view


First of all, a constant voltage was given to the sample, and after spending a minute, its maximum y-directional deflection was calculated; the deflection was observed using a calibrated microscope name Dino-Lite AM4113ZT, and then by using the image processing method, the deflection was calculated. While there no voltage is applied, the image processing is used to measure the dimensions of the specimen; the length of the beam was 27.131mm.

In the next step, the voltage was increased to 1.5V; this boosting of the voltage was because of the initial working voltage of the power supply; the diagram of the power control system is shown in [Figure 7]. Then, the voltage increased from 1.5 to 4.3V.
Figure 7: Diagram of the power control system

Click here to view


Due to [Figure 7], the AC will be converted to DC with an adjustable power supply, MW LRS 350–12; the voltage will smoothly increase and drive the IPMC membrane; this is for preventing the sample from damaging by an electric shock; the deflection will be measured with the abovementioned microscope and logged in a computer for creating its plot.

Each time that a voltage in the range of 1.5V to 4.3V is applied, the IPMC sample undergoes an amount of deflection; after the maximum deflection rate, the displacement resulting from the voltage rise at the end of the beam was recorded. This operation was recorded for each step; after recording each voltage and deflection, the amount of displacement was calculated and recorded using DinoCapture software, after calibrating it. After recording the numbers related to voltage and displacement, the graph of these changes was drawn using MATLAB. The membrane is on a wooden clamp; this clamp made a fixed constrain for the cantilever beam. Clamps which are made of copper and wood are also observable in [Figure 8].
Figure 8: Clamps used for the experimental analysis

Click here to view


The clamp is made of wood, copper, and tin; the copper plates are glued to the wooden clamp and then they are soldered to the low-power wires.

At last, all of the measured displacements after applying voltage from 0 to 4.5V are gathered in a plot shown in [Figure 9]. This plot illustrates voltage versus displacement of the specimen; totally, the displacement increases from 0 to 3.3V; however, after increasing the voltage from 3.3V to 4.3V, the displacement followed a stable path. This means that in this range of voltage, the IPMC has no efficient deflection.
Figure 9: Deflection of the IPMC while applying voltage and x-directional location is 27.131 mm

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The IPMC consists of three main layers; including electrodes and a polymer layer that usually consists of a Nafion or a Flemion.[42] Nafion is composed of various elements such as carbon, sulfur, fluorine, oxygen, and some surface impurities, and the chemical formula of this polymer is C7HF13O5SC2F4.[43] A few number of reasons that affect the IPMC actuation are the hydration concentration and the environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity.[44] In the 1960s, polymer electrolyte membranes and their special place in fuel cells were first introduced by Grubb and Niedrachat after combining water and lithium hydride to release hydrogen.[40] Nowadays, most ionic polymer metal composites are manufactured by coating platinum on the surface of the membrane. Due to the high research cost,[41] the study and preparation of low-cost[41] electrode materials have become an important research direction in the field of IPMC.[45] For describing the attitude of actuating and the whole behavior of the IPMCs, a huge number of models have been presented until now.[46]

Our results indicate that from derivation of Equation 20 up to about 1V, the speed will be decreased. Then, when the voltage from 1V reaches about 2.75V, the speed will be raised again; however, the velocity will not be as high as it was at the beginning. All of these behaviors are because of the nonlinear attitude of IPMCs. The negative velocity of the IPMC means that the deflection direction will be reversed. In Equation 20, v is the applied voltage, and Yx is the deflection of the beam while the x-directional location is 27.131 mm. Pugal et al. used FEM to analyze the IPMC's behavior,[38] In this study, in order to simplify the entire process, an equation has been found.[18] Min Yu measured the maximum deflection of the IPMC membranes with different platinum-based electrode thicknesses; they only presented a plot of the best magnitude of the specimen under diverse constant voltages.[47] Then, Kyoung Kwan Ahn designed and manufactured micropumps with changing their diaphragm shape; he concluded that square-shaped proposed diaphragm is the best choice with maximum deflection.[39] Then, Kyoung Kwan Ahn designed and manufactured micropumps with changing their diaphragm shape; he concluded that square-shaped proposed diaphragm is the best choice with maximum deflection.[48] Furthermore, Kwang J. Kim used platinum coating for a bio-inspired multidegree of freedom actuator based on a novel cylindrical ionic polymer–metal composite material; in his article, bending deflection and angle in the diagonal direction with diverse positive actuation signals was investigated.[49] Tetsuya Horiuchi researched voltage-controlled IPMC actuators for accommodating intraocular lens systems; the material used in his research was made of gold.[50] WanHasbullah MohdIsa analyzed IPMC membrane under mechanical excitation with a shaker; he measured the displacement and generated voltage.[51] Xuan Hui, used an optimized electrode plating method to create silver-based ionic polymer metal composites. He presented his results in a plot which indicates the performance of his membrane.[52] Dilip Kumar Biswal used orthogonal array method for bending response optimization of an ionic polymer–metal-composite actuator under various voltages; the material used as electrodes was made of silver.[53] Ankur Gupta, in the same year, numerically studied the method for controlling position of an underwater biomimetic IPMC membrane.[54] Min Yu measured axial displacements of the helical IPMC actuator under different signals.[55] Then, Burawudi Kennt K used a comparative method in order to predict IPMC-based soft actuators – with platinum electrodes. The maximum displacement in 2, 3, and 4 volts altered from 0 mm to 20 mm.[56] Jose Emilio Traver tried to present an equation to predict and control the IPMC membrane; unfortunately, his method was not accurate.[43]


  Conclusions Top


After comparing experimental data with the results of FEM, it is understood that the equation which was curve fitted from experimental data has a 19.072% error; it should be mentioned that this amount is extremely negligible. Another method is also used for measuring the error of this equation; the total areas of the graph of [Figure 9] limited by the x and y axes from 0 to 4.3V for that FEM and experimental test have been calculated; Equation 20 is formed based on the given voltage, and as the result, the amount of displacement can be calculated in the mentioned lengths and static situation.

Limitation of the study

The error measured by this method was 12.86%. The error can be caused by the matter of time or in the other words, dehydration phenomenon of the polymer, negligible problems while manufacturing it, or the noises caused by the used power supply. Either of the abovementioned problems can cause an error in the curve-fitted equation while comparing it with FEM.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that none of the authors have any competing interests.



 
  References Top

1.
Alici G, Spinks G, Huynh NN, Sarmadi L, Minato R. Establishment of a biomimetic device based on tri-layer polymer actuators-propulsion fins. Bioinspir Biomim 2007;2:S18-30.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Truong VT, Spinks G, McGovern S, Alici G. Finding NEMO (novel electromaterial muscle oscillator): A polypyrrole powered robotic fish with real-time wireless speed and directional control. Smart Mater Struct 2009;18:095009.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Higgins MJ, Alici G. Normal stiffness calibration of microfabricated tri-layer conducting polymer actuators. Smart Mater Struct 2009;18:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Arshizadeh S, Hamidgorgani S, Taheri P, Givgol A Shahrokhi s Abdalisousan A. The impact of COVID-19 on oil supply in the short term. Adv J Sci Eng 2021;2:120-35.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ghanavi J, Farnia P, Bahrami A, Jabbari HR, Velayati AA. Development of tracheal reconstruction methods from scaffold engineering to injectable matrix. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 2017;1:19.  Back to cited text no. 5
  [Full text]  
6.
Khazeni H, Nasrollah A, Soleimanimehr H. Nafion-based ionic-polymer-metal composites: Displacement rate analysis by changing electrode properties. Adv J Sci Eng 2021;2:51-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Yilmaz EC, Sadeler RJ. Effects of contact-stress on wear behavior of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 2020;4:51.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
8.
Bar-Cohen Y, Zhang QJ. Electroactive polymer actuators and sensors. MRS Bull 2008;33:173-81.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kotta U, Aabloo A, Kaparin V Challenges and perspectives in control of ionic polymer-metal composite (IPMC) actuators: A survey. IEEE Access 2020;8:121059-73.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Soleimanimehr H, Nasrollah A. Engineering, analysis of sweep volume effect on the output power and velocity of a gamma-type stirling engine with slider-crank mechanism features. Adv J Sci Eng 2021;2:103-10.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Khodabux RJ, Parvathi VD, Harikrishnan T. Nanocurcumin: Potential natural alkaloid against oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 2021;5:252.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ahn SH, Bhandari B, Lee GY. A review on IPMC material as actuators and sensors: Fabrications, characteristics and applications. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2012;13:141-63.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Bahramzadeh Y, Shahinpoor M. Dynamic curvature sensing employing ionic-polymer-metal composite sensors. Smart Mater Struct 2011;20:094011.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kim O, Kim SJ, Park MJ. Low-voltage-driven soft actuators. Chem Commun (Camb) 2018;54:4895-904.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zhou X, Xie X, Tang CY, Tang Y, Xue Z. Novel sulfonated polysulfone ion exchange membranes for ionic polymer-metal composite actuators. Sens Actuators B Chem 2014;202:1164-74.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Katchalsky A. Rapid swelling and deswelling of reversible gels of polymeric acids by ionization. Experientia 1949;5:319.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kuhn W, Hargitay B, Katchalsky A, Eisenberg H. Fowler M, Grot S, Kundu S, Simon L. Reversible dilation and contraction by changing the state of ionization of high-polymer acid networks. Nature 1950;165:514-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Shahinpoor M. Ion-exchange polymer-metal composites as biomimetic sensors and actuators. In: Polymer Sensors and Actuators. Zhang Y Zhao G Zang D Xu Y, Jia W: Springer; 2000. p. 325-59.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hamlen R, Kent C, Shafer S. Electrolytically activated contractile polymer. Nature 1965;206:1149-50.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rossi DD, Domenici C, Chiarelli P. Analogs of biological tissues for mechanoelectrical transduction: Tactile sensors and muscle-like actuators. In: Sensors and Sensory Systems for Advanced Robots. Heidelberg: Springer; 1988. p. 201-18.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Osada Y, Hasebe M. Electrically activated mechanochemical devices using polyelectrolyte gels. Chem Lett 1985;14:1285-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Osada Y, Okuzaki H, Hori H. A polymer gel with electrically driven motility. Nature 1992;355:242-4.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ichijo H, Yoshida R, Yamaguchi T. Novel oscillating swelling-deswelling dynamic behaviour for pH-sensitive polymer gels. Mater Sci Eng C Mater 1996;4:107-13.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Doi M, Matsumoto M, Hirose Y. Deformation of ionic polymer gels by electric fields. Macromolecules 1992;25:5504-11.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Shiga T, Kurauchi T. Deformation of polyelectrolyte gels under the influence of electric field. J Appl Polym Sci 1990;39:2305-20.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Shahinpoor M, Kim KJ, Gennes PG, Okumura K. Mechanoelectric effects in ionic gels. Europhys Lett 2000;50:513.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Hunt A, Sideris EA, Lange H. An ionic polymer metal composite (ipmc)-driven linear peristaltic microfluidic pump. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2020;5:6788-95.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
MohdIsa W, Hunt A, HosseinNia SH. Active Sensing Methods of Ionic Polymer Metal Composite (ipmc): Comparative Study in Frequency Domain. In 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Yang L, Zhang D, Zhang X, Tian A. Prediction of the actuation property of cu ionic polymer-metal composites based on backpropagation neural networks. ACS Omega 2020;5:4067-74.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Arranz JE, Lopez MA, Vinagre BM, Tejado I, Traver JE. Frequency Domain Based Fractional Order Modeling of IPMC Actuators for Control. In 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Saneei Mousavi MS, Manteghi F, Kolahdouz M. Optimization of ionic polymer metal composite fabrication via chemical electroless plating method; actuation application study. Adv J Chem Sec 2020;3:454-61.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Hui Y, Li HF, Zhao CS, Peng HM, Ding QJ. Three nonlinear performance relationships in the start-up state of IPMC strips based on finite element analysis. Smart Mater Struct 2010;19:035014.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sun Z, Aftab S, Haq M, Gang Z. Torque analysis of IPMC actuated fin of a micro fish like device using two-way fluid structure interaction approach. J Biomim Biomater Biomed Eng 2015;25:25-38.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Mojarrad, Mehran, and Mohsen Shahinpoor. “Biomimetic robotic propulsion using polymeric artificial muscles.” Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Vol. 3. IEEE, 1997.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Suer H, Bayram H. Liposomes as potential nanocarriers for theranostic applications in chronic inflammatory lung diseases. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 2017;1:1.  Back to cited text no. 35
  [Full text]  
36.
Yilmaz E, Sadeler R, Duymuş ZY, Öcal M. Effects of two-body wear on microfill, nanofill, and nanohybrid restorative composites. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 2017;1:25.  Back to cited text no. 36
  [Full text]  
37.
Franco R, Gianfreda F, Miranda M, Barlattani A, Bollero P. The hemostatic properties of chitosan in oral surgery. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 2020;4:186.  Back to cited text no. 37
  [Full text]  
38.
Boldini, Alain, Maurizio Porfiri. “Multiaxial deformations of ionic polymer metal composites.” International Journal of Engineering Science 149 (2020): 103227.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Nam DN, Ahn KK. Design of an IPMC diaphragm for micropump application. Sens Actuator A Phys 2012;187:174-82.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Das, Suparna, Kingshuk Dutta, and Dipak Rana. “Polymer electrolyte membranes for microbial fuel cells: a review.” Polymer Reviews 2018;58:610-629.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Xu Y, Jia W, Zhang Y, Wang F, Zhao G, Dongyang Z. Mechanical properties analysis and surface composition research of Ag-IPMC. Sens Actuator A Phys 2021;319:112565.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Sun Z, Aftab S, Haq M, Gang Z. Force analysis of IPMC actuated fin and wing assembly of a micro scanning device through two-way fluid structure interaction approach. Int J Eng Res Afr 2016;21:19-32.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Rodriguez P. Tejado I. Vinagre BM. Traver J. Modeling and control of IPMC-based artificial eukaryotic flagellum swimming robot: Distributed actuation. Algorithms 2022;15:181.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Madras G, Swarrup S, Ganguli J. Studies to improve the actuation capability of low-frequency IPMC actuators for underwater robotic applications. ISSS J Micro Smart Syst 2019;8:41-7.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Zheng S, Li H, Cho S, Kim H, Kim SJ,, Choi E et la. High-fidelity bioelectronic muscular actuator based on porous carboxylate bacterial cellulose membrane. Sens Actuators B Chem 2017;250:402-11.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
SamPour S, Moeinkhah H, Rahmani H. Electrochemical viscoelastic modeling to predict quasi-static and dynamic response of IPMC actuators. Mech Mater 2019;138:103172.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
He Q, Vokoun D, Yin G, Xu X, Lyu P, Wu Y, et al. Experimental study and model analysis of the performance of IPMC membranes with various thickness. J Bionic Eng 2011;8:77-85.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Wong J, Kim KJ, Yim W, Kim SJ, Pugal D. A bio-inspired multi degree of freedom actuator based on a novel cylindrical ionic polymer-metal composite material. Rob Auton Syst 2014;62:53-60.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Fowler M, Grot S, Kundu S, Simon L. Mechanical properties of Nafion™ electrolyte membranes under hydrated conditions. Polymer 2005;46:11707-15.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Fujikado T, Oshika T, Asaka K, Horiuchi T, Mihashi T. Voltage-controlled IPMC actuators for accommodating intra-ocular lens systems. Smart Mater Struct 2017;26:045021.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
MohdIsa W, Hunt A, HosseinNia SH. Sensing and self-sensing actuation methods for ionic polymer-metal composite (ipmc): A review. Sensors 2019;19:3967.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Xuan H, Aifen T, Qianqian W, Liang Y, Xinrong Z, Shanshan C. Research on process optimization of Ag-IPMC. Integr Ferroelectr 2020;210:106-15.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Biswal DK, Moharana BR, Mohapatra TP. Bending response optimization of an ionic polymer-metal composite actuator using orthogonal array method. Mater Today Proc 2022;49:1550-5.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Gupta A, Mukherjee SJ. Position control of a biomimetic IPMC underwater propulsor. J Inst Eng 2021;102:1031-40.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
He Q, Vokoun D, Yin G, Xu X, Lyu P, Wu Y, Yu M. Axial motion characterization of a helical ionic polymer metal composite actuator and its application in 3-DOF micro-parallel platforms. Actuators 2021;10:2-19.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Burawudi KK, D'Anniballe R, Langius RG, Carloni R. A Comparative Study of Predictive Models for Nafion-117 IPMC Soft Actuators. In 2021 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE; 2021.  Back to cited text no. 56
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed563    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded58    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]